The scrutiny of multinational operations has intensified in jurisdictions where institutional capacity is still developing, yet the stakes for tax compliance are rapidly increasing. As emerging economies strive to protect domestic revenue bases while encouraging foreign investment, transfer pricing has become a central and often contested issue in international taxation.

Unlike in mature economies where administrative infrastructure and regulatory precedent support consistent application, transfer pricing in emerging markets often unfolds against a backdrop of regulatory uncertainty, resource limitations, and evolving legal norms. This creates an uneven playing field where enterprises must understand not only the technicalities of arm’s length pricing, but also the nuances of fragmented enforcement, data scarcity, and shifting expectations.

This article explores the unique landscape of transfer pricing in developing countries, the compliance risks inherent in such environments, and the policy developments shaping the future of transfer pricing regulation.

What Is Transfer Pricing in the Context of Emerging Markets?

Transfer pricing refers to the pricing of goods, services, and intangible assets transferred within affiliated entities of a multinational enterprise. In emerging markets, this concept carries additional layers of complexity due to underdeveloped infrastructure, inconsistent regulatory enforcement, and limited access to reliable data.

While the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has established robust guidelines on transfer pricing, many emerging economies are in the process of aligning their local regulations with these standards. The adoption of OECD transfer pricing in developing economies reflects a commitment to improving transparency and curbing base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS).

However, the practical implementation often lags due to systemic and structural challenges. This creates a dual need wherein MNEs must ensure alignment with global standards while adapting to local realities.

Challenges Faced in Emerging Economies

While many emerging economies have made strides in adopting transfer pricing frameworks, significant operational and structural hurdles remain. These challenges are not merely technical, they reflect deeper limitations in institutional capacity, regulatory coherence, and economic volatility that complicate consistent application of transfer pricing rules.

  1. Lack of Clear Regulations: Many developing countries have either recently introduced transfer pricing laws or operate under outdated frameworks. This creates ambiguity for taxpayers and increases the likelihood of disputes.
  2. Limited Administrative Capacity: Tax authorities in countries across Africa, Asia, and Latin America often struggle with limited human and technological resources. This affects their ability to assess and audit intercompany transactions effectively.
  3. Inconsistent Enforcement: Even where regulations exist, inconsistent enforcement leads to unpredictability. Businesses may face retroactive audits or differing interpretations from local tax officers.
  4. Currency Fluctuations: Emerging markets are prone to high inflation and volatile exchange rates, complicating the accurate benchmarking of intercompany prices.
  5. Data Scarcity: Reliable comparables and financial data are often scarce or inaccessible. This hampers the application of the arm’s length principle and increases the risk of transfer pricing adjustments. For instance: In Nigeria, local comparables are limited, leading many businesses to rely on regional benchmarks, which may not always reflect local market conditions.

Regulatory Landscape and Government Focus

Governments in emerging markets are increasingly aware of the risks associated with ineffective transfer pricing regulation. Many have started aligning with international best practices, particularly the OECD’s BEPS framework.

  1. India has been proactive, introducing Safe Harbour Rules and Advance Pricing Agreements (APAs) to provide certainty to taxpayers.
  2. Brazil has historically followed a formula-based approach but is moving toward OECD-aligned guidelines.
  3. Kenya and other African nations are expanding their transfer pricing audit teams and enhancing capacity through international partnerships.
  4. Colombia and Mexico are strengthening their documentation requirements and improving audit readiness.

These efforts signal a global shift toward tighter control and enhanced transparency. Commenda regularly tracks regulatory developments and provides clients with up-to-date guidance tailored to each jurisdiction. You can explore and grasp Commenda’s Global Transfer Pricing Insights.

Transfer Pricing Documentation in Developing Countries

As emerging economies integrate into global value chains, they increasingly adopt transfer pricing documentation frameworks aligned with the OECD’s three-tiered approach:

  1. Master File: Summarizes the multinational group’s overall structure, global activities, and the principles guiding its transfer pricing arrangements.
  2. Local File: Details specific intercompany transactions of the local entity, including financial information and comparability analysis.
  3. Country-by-Country Reporting (CbCR): Offers a breakdown of the multinational’s global allocation of income, taxes paid, and economic activity by jurisdiction.

While these frameworks aim to enhance transparency and compliance, their implementation in developing countries often encounters significant challenges:

  1. Africa: Early Stages of Enforcement: Many African nations have codified transfer pricing regulations based on OECD guidelines. Nonetheless, despite regulatory frameworks being in place, enforcement often falls short, hindered by insufficient institutional capacity and a lack of necessary resources. For instance, while Nigeria mandates the submission of transfer pricing documentation within 21 days upon request, non-compliance penalties are still being standardized and enforced.
  2. Latin America: Gaps in Data Access: Tax authorities across the region, including in Mexico and Colombia, have ramped up scrutiny of transfer pricing practices, even as they grapple with limited access to reliable financial data. Despite this aggressive stance, they often face challenges due to insufficient local comparables and limited access to reliable data, complicating the enforcement of arm’s length principles.

This mismatch between legal requirements and enforcement capacity increases the risk of under-documentation, exposing companies to penalties, double taxation, or prolonged disputes.

Strategies for Compliance in High-Risk Markets

Operating in high-risk jurisdictions requires a proactive and localized approach. Here are some key strategies:

  1. Engage Local Advisors: Local experts understand the nuances of jurisdiction-specific laws and enforcement practices.
  2. Benchmark with Regional Comparables: Where local data is unavailable, use regional benchmarks that reflect similar economic conditions.
  3. Regularly Review Intercompany Transactions: Ensure transfer pricing policies remain aligned with local economic changes and business realities.
  4. Build Robust Internal Audit Trails: Document decision-making processes, pricing methodologies, and intercompany agreements.
  5. Leverage Technology: Commenda offers automation tools that simplify the preparation of Master and Local Files, ensure data consistency, and support real-time compliance monitoring.

By adopting these strategies, businesses can significantly reduce transfer pricing risks in Africa, Asia, and Latin America.

Impact of BEPS and Global Standards on Emerging Markets

The OECD’s BEPS Action Plan has reshaped the global transfer pricing landscape. While it aims to curb tax avoidance, it poses unique challenges for developing countries:

  1. Capacity Constraints: Implementing BEPS measures demands technical expertise and resources that many emerging markets lack.
  2. Revenue Concerns: There’s growing concern that profit allocation under BEPS may still favor developed countries, reducing tax revenues in source countries.
  3. UN vs. OECD Frameworks: Some developing countries advocate for the United Nations’ more inclusive, source-based approach to better reflect their economic realities.

Nevertheless, the global move toward transparency and consistency is pushing even reluctant jurisdictions to adopt OECD transfer pricing in developing economies. Commenda helps bridge the compliance gap by providing user-friendly solutions and strategic insights tailored to local contexts.

How Commenda Supports Transfer Pricing in Emerging Markets

At Commenda, we specialize in simplifying complex transfer pricing challenges for businesses operating across borders. Our approach is designed to meet the unique demands of emerging economies.

  1. Localized Expertise: Our network of seasoned professionals across Africa, Asia, and Latin America ensures jurisdiction-specific insights and practical support.
  2. Automated Documentation Tools: We provide intuitive software that streamlines documentation, integrates regional benchmarks, and supports real-time updates.
  3. Strategic Advisory Services: From transaction reviews to dispute resolution, our experts help design sustainable transfer pricing models.
  4. Audit Readiness: With our proactive monitoring tools, businesses can stay ahead of compliance deadlines and defend positions during audits.

Whether you’re entering a new market or reassessing your global TP strategy, Commenda delivers the clarity, compliance, and confidence you need. Book a Demo, today!

Conclusion

Transfer pricing in emerging markets presents a complex blend of regulatory uncertainty, enforcement inconsistency, and data limitations. Yet, with rising global standards and increased local scrutiny, businesses must take a proactive and localized approach.

By aligning with international guidelines, building robust documentation, and leveraging expert support from partners like Commenda, companies can mitigate transfer pricing risks in Africa, Asia, and Latin America while staying audit-ready and compliant.

Let Commenda be your guide through the evolving world of transfer pricing compliance in emerging economies.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

  1. Why is transfer pricing challenging in emerging markets?

Emerging markets often lack clear regulations, reliable data, and consistent enforcement, making it difficult for businesses to comply confidently.

  1. What are the documentation requirements?

Most developing countries are adopting the OECD’s three-tiered documentation framework: Master File, Local File, and CbCR. However, enforcement levels vary.

  1. How does BEPS affect developing countries?

BEPS has increased transparency and compliance burdens. While it aims to reduce tax avoidance, it also challenges the administrative capacity of developing tax authorities.

  1. How can Commenda help my business stay compliant?

Commenda offers localized advisory, automated documentation, and audit readiness tools tailored to the realities of transfer pricing in developing countries.

‍